|
Main Menu
Who's Online
There are 121 unlogged users and 0 registered users online.
You can log-in or register for a user account here.
Sponsored Links
|
Friday, December 09, 2005 - 06:52 AM
(1 + 2 + 3 +...+ n)2 = 13+ 23+ 33+...+ n3
Examples: (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)2 = 225 = 13 + 23 + 33 + 43 + 53 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6)2 = 441 = 13 + 23 + 33 + 43 + 53 + 63 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7)2 = 784 = 13+ 23 + 33 + 43 + 53 + 63 + 73 |
User's Login
Sponsored Links
Other Stories
|
Comments
sum (n) = (n)(n+1)/2
And with
sum (n^3) = ((n)(n+1)/{2})^2
So you see its true for all n. But, I don't see why. Anyone else have any insights.
you can prove it by mathematical induction... since it's very late here, i think i'll post the proof tomorrow
*Exploration
(1 + 2)^2 = 9 = 1^3 + 2^3
(1 + 2 + 3)^2 = 36 = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3
(1 + 2 + 3 + 4)^2 = 100 = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3
(1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5)^2 = 225 = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3
*Recall
Pythagoras triangular number Tn = 1 + 2 + 3 + + n
Solve for Tn in terms of n:
Sol.
Let Tn=S:
S = 1 + 2 + 3 + + (n-1) + n
S + S = 2S = (1+n) + (2+(n-1)) + + ((n-1)+2) + (n+1))
2S= n(n+1)
S = Tn = n(n+1)/2
This can be proven true by induction for any n
*Substitution
Therefore, observing our original statement,
(Tn)2 = 1^3 + 2^3 + + n^3
*Simplify the cubes
*Exploration
1^3 + 2^3 = 9 = (2 + 1)^2
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 = 36 = (3 + 3)^2
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 = 100 = (4 + 6)^2
1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 = 225 = (5 + 10)^2
A pattern emerges:
1^3 + 2^3 + + n^3 = (n + Tn-1)^2, or
1^3 + 2^3 + + n^3 = (n + (n-1)(n)/2)^2, or
1^3 + 2^3 + + n^3 = ( (n^2+n)/2)^2, or simply
1^3 + 2^3 + + n^3 = (Tn)^2
*Substitution
(Tn)^2 = (Tn)^2
This is a very round-about proof, but it shows that the assumption holds true, so the square of a sum of the first n natural numbers is equal to the sum of their cubes
I'm not so sure this proof by induction is valid, it seems that simply a pattern was observed, but no actual induction took place, i.e. there is no demonstration that the nth term implies the n+1 term to be true. What is shown above is inductive reasoning, not inductive proof.
I am working on a proof myself, if i finish it i will post, I would also appreciate any comments regarding the validity of the inductive proof shown. Inductive proof is relatively new to me, last year in discrete we covered it but only briefly.
Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in